Could you elaborate on why the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has so far only approved spot
Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), despite the widespread interest in derivatives and futures-based bitcoin products? Given the potential benefits of futures-based ETFs, such as their ability to hedge against market risks, why did the SEC opt for a more conservative approach with spot bitcoin ETFs? Are there specific regulatory concerns or challenges that prevented the approval of futures-based bitcoin ETFs? It seems like a logical next step in the evolution of the crypto market, so what are the potential obstacles preventing this from happening?
7 answers
TopazRider
Fri Jul 12 2024
The Commission's move came under significant pressure from the judicial opinion, which highlighted the need for a consistent regulatory framework for cryptocurrency-related products.
CryptoWizard
Fri Jul 12 2024
The Commission's decision to approve spot bitcoin ETFs was prompted by a unanimous opinion authored by Neomi Rao of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Tommaso
Fri Jul 12 2024
The approval of spot bitcoin ETFs marks a significant milestone in the development of the cryptocurrency industry, as it provides investors with more options to access and trade bitcoin.
CryptoLodestarGuard
Fri Jul 12 2024
The availability of ETFs is expected to increase liquidity in the bitcoin market and promote further adoption of the digital currency.
EthereumEagle
Fri Jul 12 2024
This opinion characterized the SEC's resistance to bitcoin ETFs as "arbitrary and capricious."