I'm curious, for those who have taken the Financial Risk Manager (FRM) exam, do you find Part 2 to be more challenging than Part 1? Could you elaborate on the differences in terms of content, complexity, or time management that may contribute to this perception? Additionally, are there any specific topics or concepts in Part 2 that you believe require extra attention or preparation compared to Part 1?
5 answers
EtherealVoyager
Tue Aug 20 2024
Despite the variation, the 13-year average pass rate for Part 1 stands at a respectable 46%. This average reflects the dedication and perseverance of candidates who successfully navigate the rigorous requirements of the first part of the exam.
EclipseRider
Tue Aug 20 2024
Shifting focus to Part 2, the pass rates exhibit a similar, yet more pronounced, upward trend. Over the past 13 years, the pass rates for this section have ranged from 50% to 63%. This indicates that candidates who reach the second part of the exam are better prepared and possess a stronger understanding of the material.
CryptoLodestar
Tue Aug 20 2024
Reflecting this improved preparedness, the 13-year average pass rate for Part 2 surpasses that of Part 1, standing at 57%. This achievement underscores the value of thorough preparation and highlights the significant milestones achieved by those who successfully complete both parts of the FRM exam.
noah_smith_researcher
Tue Aug 20 2024
The progression through the Financial Risk Manager (FRM) exam reveals a consistent trend of rising pass rates. As candidates advance from Part 1 to Part 2, the average success rate notably improves.
PhoenixRising
Tue Aug 20 2024
Examining the historical data since 2010, the pass rates for Part 1 of the FRM exam have fluctuated between 39% and 53%. This range underscores the challenging nature of the initial stage, with candidates facing a diverse range of topics and concepts.