Why we use Redux instead of useState?

When considering the complexity of an application, it's crucial to make an informed decision on the state management tool to employ. For straightforward applications composed of minimal components, the useState() hook from React proves to be a sufficient choice. This hook offers a simple and direct way to manage local state, making it ideal for smaller projects.

On the other hand, applications that exhibit intricate state interactions across multiple components call for a more robust solution. In such scenarios, Redux emerges as the preferred option. Redux provides a predictable state container for JavaScript apps, ensuring that state changes are clearly documented and easily traceable.

The decision between useState() and Redux also hinges on the size and skill level of the development team. Smaller teams or those with less experience in state management can benefit greatly from useState()'s simplicity and straightforwardness. It enables developers to quickly grasp the basics of state management, fostering a smoother learning curve.

However, as projects grow in complexity and team sizes expand, the limitations of useState() may become apparent. In these instances, transitioning to Redux can enhance scalability and maintainability, ensuring that the codebase remains manageable even as new features are added.

BTCC, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, offers a comprehensive range of services catering to the diverse needs of its users. Its offerings include but are not limited to spot trading, where users can buy and sell cryptocurrencies at current market prices.