In the first consultation, how are cryptoassets typically categorized or grouped? Are there specific criteria or factors that practitioners consider when making these distinctions? Are there any common categories that emerge, such as utility tokens, security tokens, or stablecoins? Additionally, how do these groupings impact the legal and regulatory treatment of cryptoassets, and what implications does this have for investors and
market participants?
6 answers
KpopStarletShine
Sat Aug 31 2024
The division into two main groups is a strategic move, designed to streamline the regulatory process and ensure that cryptoassets are treated appropriately.
CryptoConqueror
Sat Aug 31 2024
Group 1 encompasses those cryptoassets that can be subjected to the Basel Framework, with certain adjustments made to accommodate their unique characteristics.
TaegeukChampionCourage
Sat Aug 31 2024
This approach recognizes the evolving nature of the cryptocurrency landscape and aims to strike a balance between innovation and risk management.
Eleonora
Sat Aug 31 2024
The proposal for regulating cryptoassets in the initial consultation has retained its fundamental structure, ensuring a logical division of these digital assets.
Michele
Sat Aug 31 2024
By adapting the Basel Framework, regulators can leverage existing frameworks and expertise while accommodating the specific requirements of cryptoassets.