What are the 4 types of stasis?

The first category is conjectural stasis, which concerns disagreements over the facts or evidence presented in a debate. Here, participants may challenge the validity or accuracy of the information being used to support a particular argument.

The second type is definitional stasis, where the disagreement lies in the interpretation or meaning of key terms. Participants may argue over the precise definition of a word or concept, as different interpretations can lead to vastly different conclusions.

Stasis, a term rooted in rhetorical invention, refers to a methodical process of inquiry aimed at pinpointing the crux of a debate. This approach involves posing a series of strategic questions to uncover the fundamental disagreement, or "stasis," at hand.

Qualitative stasis represents disagreements over the value or merit of a particular argument or position. In this category, participants may debate the relative importance or significance of various factors, ultimately aiming to determine which side holds the more compelling argument.

The ancient Greeks and Romans recognized four distinct types of conflicts that could arise during debates, each categorized under the umbrella of stasis. These categories provided a framework for understanding and addressing the various dimensions of disagreement.